Tim Boreham: Medadvisor’s nagging business model
Health & Biotech
Health & Biotech
Link copied to
When you think about it, Medadvisor’s business model – nag forgetful patients into taking their pills and increase the current poor level of compliance – is simple.
According to Medadvisor (ASX:MDR), drug adherence is a huge issue with only about half of Australia’s eight million chronic illness sufferers correctly taking their medication.
This could be from fear of side effects, or because of the daily burden of having to manage multiple drugs, or just plain forgetting.
Medadvisor’s core business is Plusone, a software application-based platform through which pharmacies communicate via text messages with patients. The next linkage – to their doctors – is a work in progress.
To date 3,100 pharmacies have signed up, with participating chemists accounting for 55 per cent of the market. These include the banner groups Amcal/Guardian, Terry White, Pharmasave and National Pharmacies.
As at June 30, 2018, Medadvisor boasted one million patients on the platform, a 23 per cent increase on the previous year.
“We only have one out of 12 chronic patients and we are keen to get more on the platform,” Medadvisor CEO Robert Read says.
Medadvisor was founded in 2012 by local software engineer Josh Swinnerton, who sits on the board. He was motivated by the experience of his mother, a Parkinson’s disease sufferer trying to manage more than 10 daily medications.
Medadvisor morphed into its current incarnation via a reverse takeover of iron ore explorer Exalt Resources in December 2015. The accompanying fund raising of $5 million at three cents apiece was “heavily oversubscribed”.
In short, Medadvisor’s products are Plusone (the text-message communication systems from pharmacy to patient), the patient platform (allowing automated medical history and online script re-ordering) and general practitioner software, which is largely for patient bookings, but also to renew patient scripts and manage nursing home prescriptions.
Given the sensitivity of holding patient data, the digital appointments sector has had its controversies in recent times (see below).
The company says electronic ordering accounted for $235 million of prescriptions in 2017-18, up from $167 million previously.
Medadvisor recently added clinical trial recruitment to its repertoire.
This industry is worth $2 billion a year globally, with “significant challenges in finding the most eligible patients in a cost effective and timely manner”.
In fact, 80 per cent of trials are delayed because of slow recruitment, which is especially the case with exotic diseases that afflict hundreds rather than thousands of people globally.
But how does this fit in with Medadvisor’s existing business? The answer lies in that one million strong patient database, which is gold in terms of identifying the ailment, location and age and other demographic factors.
On the other side, Medadvisor has a close relationship with the pharma companies that commission the trials.
“The time taken for clinical trial recruitment is horrific, averaging 240 days,” Mr Read says.
“Every week of delay in recruitment is an extra week of sales if the drug reaches its full potential. We can do what it takes 12 to 14 weeks to do in one week.”
Medadvisor has already facilitated four small-scale trials, with fees charged on a per-patient or trial set-up basis.
“We don’t expect to shoot the lights out in the first year but it is something we will build,” Mr Read says.
Medadvisor is supported by 16 drug companies including Astrazeneca, Novartis, Glaxosmithkline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, who fund education programs – 33 at last count – for individual drugs.
Medadvisor charges a set-up fee per relevant patient, typically $10.
“The drug companies have screeds of information about their drugs, but struggle to reach the audience,” Mr Read says.
“It gives them a pathway to eight million people on chronic medication, a population that is very targeted but hard to reach.”
Medadvisor is also emerging as a preferred platform for chemists to promote non-dispensing services such a health checks, blood pressure monitoring or how to use an inhaler.
Competition and controversies
While Medadvisor claims to be the leader in providing an ‘agnostic’ product that can be integrated across all platforms, there are plenty of reminder and appointment booking app services on offer. Medadvisor is the only one offering patient reminders.
The biggest local rival, the privately-owned Health Engine, has been in the news for all the wrong reasons amid allegations that it provided patient details to personal injury firm Slater & Gordon under a ‘partnership program’.
Part owned by Telstra and Seven West Media, Health Engine claims 1.5 million patients linked to 13,000 practitioners.
After Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt ordered an urgent review of the matter, the company says the referrals to Slater & Gordon were made with the patient’s consent, but did ’fess up to doctoring online reviews of general practitioner clinics that removed negative comments.
Also privately owned, Hotdocs recently raised $5 million to capitalise on Health Engine’s stumbles.
The ASX-listed 1st Group facilitates bookings for professional practices including optometrists, dentists, health insurers, veterinarians and pharmacists.
With an $8 million market cap compared with Medadvisor’s $40 million worth, 1st Group recorded $3.42 million of revenue in 2017-18.
Mr Read says: “We are about the right message to the right patient at the right time. They can opt out whenever they want. If you are on heart medication you will get information about heart medication and nothing else.”
Chemist chains the key
In October 2017 Ebos Investments, an arm of the listed trans-Tasman chemist group that owns the Terry White chain and the Symbion full-line drug distribution business, invested $9.5 million in the company at 5.75 cents a share. Ebos now owns 14 per cent of Medadvisor.
Sigma Healthcare is also on the register with a three per cent stake, and white labels the product across three chemist banners.
In June, Medadvisor announced it would integrate its platform with US drug dispensary PDX Inc, which services 10,000 of the country’s 60,000 pharmacies (or should that be drug stores?).
“These guys understand the industry really well and the value of the product really well,” Mr Read says.
“The ability to deal [with the chains] is really important when you try to connect [doctors] and hospitals to the network. We are in the phase of joining these things together.”
Financial and performance
Medadvisor chalked up $7.24 million of revenue in 2017-18, including a $634,000 research and development tax refund. In 2015-16 Medadvisor managed revenue of $1.76 million, rising to $4.9 million in 2016-17.
In late November, the company said the annualised contract value of new revenue for the 2018-19 year had reached 76 per cent of the value of the 2017-18 revenue – an encouraging run rate.
Of the 2017-18 revenue, 63 per cent was recurring (subscription revenue from the chemists). The remainder was “user based”: transactional SMS revenue, doctor bookings and such.
Medadvisor says it is profitable “purely on an operational level” with earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) last year of $1.9 million compared with a $500,000 deficit previously.
Old fashioned that we are, we’ll stick with the reported bottom line loss of $4,455,211. This reflects $3.7 million of development costs and a further $3.6 million in sales and marketing.
Mr Read says Medadvisor’s cash balance of $8.7 million (at the end of September) should be enough to fund the company’s growth without a capital raising.
Dr Boreham’s diagnosis:
Management reasons it has a long way to go given the chemist population of 5,500 in Australia (owned by 3,500 individuals) and 24,000 full-time equivalent medical general practitioners.
Medadvisor’s strategy revolves around increasing the existing business as well as expanding the general practitioner business.
Medical clinic chains are also a target. “We haven’t done what we wanted to do but we think we are there now,” Mr Read says.
In early December, the company announced a 50:50 partnership with drug giant Zuellig Pharma to enter the Filipino and South Korean markets, “with other markets to follow”.
Medadvisor is assessing its US and British entry strategies. Naturally, in the US it’s likely to be done hand-in-hand with PDX.
“We know the US market is complex and there are tricks we need to be aware of. There are a lot of opportunities but we need to bring the right technology first,” Mr Read says.
While Australia accounts for only 2 per cent of the global medicine market, he expects the local market to drive revenues in the short term.
This column first appeared in Biotech Daily.
Disclosure: Dr Boreham is not a qualified medical practitioner and does not possess a doctorate of any sort. He has always confused scrip with script but with neither medical nor financial benefits to date. The content of this article was not selected, modified or otherwise controlled by Stockhead. Stockhead has not provided, endorsed or otherwise assumed responsibility for any financial product advice contained in this article.